hotpromptThe framework

Specs & requirements

7 decisions a prompt of this kind should make on purpose, and 6 things worth leaving out.

Asks that land here

prd, spec, product requirements, requirements doc, ticket, jira ticket, user story, acceptance criteria, feature spec, scope this, epic, definition of done, backlog item, one-pager, technical spec, rfc

The moves
  1. +Deliverable + featureProduce a lightweight PRD: problem, goals, user stories, functional requirements, acceptance criteria, non-goals, open questions.
  2. +Problem & user / why nowState the assumed user, the problem it solves, and the business reason; flag these as assumptions to confirm.
  3. +In-scope vs non-goalsDefine a minimal v1 and an explicit 'Non-goals / later' section for anything adjacent.
  4. +Acceptance criteria / definition of doneWrite testable, checkbox / Given-When-Then criteria covering happy path, empty/error states, and edge cases.
  5. +Constraints (tech, timeline, compliance)Assume the current stack; note timeline and compliance as open questions; never fabricate SLAs or metrics.
  6. +Document shape / sectionsStandard PRD sections with headers, skimmable with a short summary up top; match artifact weight to the ask.
  7. +Prioritization / phasingTag each requirement P0/P1/P2 or split into v1 vs later phases.

Left out for this type: role ('expert product manager'); 'professional and engaging' tone; padding v1 with speculative features; inventing SLAs/metrics as fact; marketing/benefit-selling in the spec body; over-formatting a 2-line ticket into a full PRD

Try it on one of these